Engage Stakeholders
Who should be involved?
Grade 9 Program teachers, resource teacher, students, parents, school board
|
How might they be engaged?
By determining if the goals are being met and if the program is more beneficial than detrimental.
|
What are you going to evaluate? Describe program (logic model).
The Grade Nine Learning Community at Mount Royal Collegiate
|
What is the purpose of the evaluation?
To determine whether the program is allowing for a smooth transition from grade eight, and helping to retain students.
|
Who will use the evaluation? How will they use it?
Who/users
|
How will they use the information?
|
Program Teachers
|
They can make changes to the program depending on the results.
|
School Administrators
|
Determine whether the program should continue or not.
|
What questions will the evaluation seek to answer?
Does the program actually help to transition kids from grade eight to grade nine?
|
How does it prepare them for grade ten if the program is similar to grade eight groupings?
|
Does it help retain students more effectively than without the program?
Are the relationships authentic – do they continue past grade 9 and consequently lead to success in later years.
|
What information do you need to answer the questions?
What I wish to know
|
Indicators – How will I know it?
|
Attendance data before and after the program was in place
|
If attendance improved, then the program has some benefit.
|
Reading and math scores before and after program
|
If better after, benefit to the program.
|
Failure rates before and after program.
|
If students are not failing as many classes as before the program was implemented, then it would indicate merit.
|
Grade 9 attendance data compared to grade 10 attendance data
|
If attendance is good in grade 9 and changes significantly in grade 10 it would indicate several things about the program.
|
When is the evaluation needed?
By the end of the 2012-2013 school year to determine if changes need to be made for next year.
|
What evaluation design will you use?
A mix of Stake’s Countenance Model, and Scriven’s Summative Model
|
Collect the information
What sources of information will you use?
Existing information:
|
Attendance reports, test results
|
People:
|
Teachers in the program, resource teacher, administration,
|
Pictorial records and observations:
|
None
|
What data collection method(s) will you use?
*
|
Survey
|
Document review
| |
*
|
Interview
|
*
|
Testimonials
|
Observation
|
Expert panel
| ||
Group techniques
|
Simulated problems or situations
| ||
Case study
|
Journal, log, diary
| ||
*
|
Tests
|
Unobtrusive measures
| |
Photos, videos
|
Attendance Reports
|
Other (list)
|
Instrumentation: What is needed to record the information?
A program to compile the attendance reports to determine if change has occurred.
|
When will you collect data for each method you’ve chosen?
Method
|
Before program
|
During program
|
Immediately after
|
Later
|
Interview/survey past students of the program
|
*
| |||
Interview/survey teachers in the program
|
*
| |||
Attendance reports
|
*
|
*
|
Will a sample be used?
No
| ||
Yes
|
*
|
If yes, describe the procedure you will use.
|
Students in grades 9, 10 and 12 will be used to gain information about their take on the program.
|
Analyze and Interpret
How will the data be analyzed?
Data analysis methods:
|
Analyze the surveys to determine if students find benefit to the program –interview grade 9, 10 and 12 students – students who are in the program, recently out of the program, and students who have had time to reflect on the program.
Teacher responses will also be analyzed to determine how they believe the program is running.
Analyze grade 9 attendance and test results and compare them to the same students in grade ten
|
Who responsible:
|
Me
|
How will the information be interpreted—by whom?
I will interpret the information by compiling answers and looking for consistency
|
What did you learn? What are the limitations?
Some of the responses could be subjective, from both the teachers in the program, and from the students. There are many variables that can determine a response; grade 9 students may not be the most reflective when it comes to their learning and motivations.
|
Teachers of the program may be biased because they started it and are so close to it.
|
Use the Information
How will the evaluation be communicated and shared?
To whom
|
When/where/how to present
|
Teachers of the program
|
Present reports on data and how students perceive the program and what is happening in reality.
|
Administration
|
Present reports on data and how students perceive the program and what is happening in reality.
|
Next steps?
Show this to the teachers of the Grade 9 Learning Community to determine where the gaps are
|
Reports will be anonymous
|
Human subject’s protection
|
Utility
| |
Management chart
|
Feasibility
| ||
Timeline
|
Propriety
| ||
*
|
Responsibilities
|
Accuracy
| |
None Needed
|
Budget
|
Somanta you set up the plan with enough detail to create a strong foundation. You have addressed each component sufficiently. I think that the analysis and the limitations sections are especially well done. I was wondering if there are other potential audiences for this evaluation.
ReplyDeleteJay